Criminal Law Article


Changing Rules for Bail Bonds

The Arizona Supreme Court is leading the charge among the nation’s courts to change the rules for setting bail in criminal cases.  In recent years, there has been growing concern about the inequities in the bail bond system and about the effectiveness of bail in deterring flight risk.  Dave Byers, the administrative director for the Arizona courts described the need for change in a recent interview:

“Over time, people have realized that we’re one of only 2 countries in the world that require people to pay somebody some money to get out of jail – I think it’s us and the Philippines.  What people determined is when you impose money in the system, the only thing you’re really doing is separating people who have money from people who don’t have money.”

The income disparity described By Byers is at the heart of the drive for rule changes.  The Arizona State Legislature has looked at bail reformation issues, and several bills on the subject were proposed, but thus far, none have passed.  The Arizona Courts, under the leadership of Scott Bales, Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court, have decided to move forward on their own.  The courts recently enacted rule changes that would allow more low-income, low-risk defendants to be released on their own recognizance while awaiting trial.

Studies Have Shown that Requiring Bail Does Not Lower the Defendant’s Risk of Flight.

Even without research, common sense tells us that a wealthy drug lord who posted a 1 Million Dollar bond may flee the country and forfeit the money rather than face 20 years in prison.  After all, to someone like him, $ 1 Million is probably chicken feed.  On the other hand, a homeless guy, arrested for shoplifting, will stay in jail pending trial.  His bail might be set at a mere $250, but with no income or support system, he cannot raise the money.

Research tells us that our common-sense understanding is correct. A 2013 study by the Pretrial Justice Institute found that defendants who paid bail for release from jail were no more likely to show up for trial than those released on their own recognizance who faced a fine if they later failed to appear.   A study by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation described how low-income, low-risk defendants often lose their jobs or housing when they lack the funds to obtain bail.  The poor often linger in jail for relatively minor offenses like shop lifting, drug possession, and theft.  In contrast, affluent defendants, charged with serious crimes, are out on bail. 
While investigating the effectiveness of the bail system, The Arnold Foundation Study looked at more than 1.5 million cases from 300 jurisdictions in the U.S.  Based on the results of the study, the Foundation developed a tool for assessing a defendant’s flight risk and potential danger to the community.

Arizona Change to the Rules of Criminal Procedure.

In December, 2016, the Arizona Supreme Court ordered bail reform changes to the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure.  The changes to Rules 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3 were implemented on April 3, 2017.  The courts are now using a version of the Arnold tool to evaluate defendants after arrest. 

Before a defendant’s initial appearance, he or she will be screened by a court employee to determine the level of risk he poses to the community and his risk of flight. The screening test is called a Public Safety Assessment and looks at nine variables, including prior felony arrests and prior instances of failure to appear.  The Public Safety Assessment gives a score that helps the judge or court commissioner decide whether to release the defendant pending trial, to release him with conditions of pretrial supervision, or to hold him in jail until trial. The new rule does not apply to cases where the denial of bail is mandatory under state law.  For instance, it will not apply in sexual assault cases.

The Rule changes are not without critics. Some prosecutors are skeptical about the new system.  There are concerns about the quality of the Public Safety Assessments and about the training and focus of the employees doing the assessments.  Of course, the bail bond industry is completely opposed to the new rules.  They see their livelihoods disappearing.  They have lobbied against the rule changes and have raised concerns about the lack of an adequate collection and enforcement process.  Traditionally, when a defendant failed to appear for a hearing, the bail bond company would dispatch a retrieval agent to track down the fugitive and turn him or her into the police.  It will now be up to local police departments to assume that role.  We can only assume that tracking down someone who failed to appear on a shop lifting charge will not be high on their priority list.  The other concern is collections.  If the courts fine defendants for failing to appear for a hearing, what is the mechanism for collecting those fines? 

Judges Still Have the Option to Set Bail for a Defendant.

Despite the rule changes, judges still have the option to require a financial based bond.  However, the judge “must impose the least onerous” type of bail bond necessary in the lowest amount necessary to protect the community and other people in the defendant’s life.  There may be times when a judge believes a suitable bail amount will serve to deter a particular defendant from fleeing the jurisdiction.  In that event, the old bail procedures will still serve.  The family can go to a bail bondsman once the bail is set, or the family can pay the bond directly.  To pay a bond directly, you must know the inmate’s full name and date of birth.  You must know the booking number for the inmate.  Obtain a postal money order, a Western Union money order, or a cashier’s check in the exact amount of the bond. In Maricopa County, the check is made out to the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.  Payment can be made at the Madison Street Jail.  In Pima County, checks and money orders are paid at Pima County Adult Detention Center. 

If the bail is large and family members need to use their home or other real estate as surety for the bond, the process is more complicated.  The property will need to be appraised, documentation provided that proves the person posting the bond’s equity in the property, and a trust deed made out to the clerk of the court.  The court then issues an order to authorize the property to be used as the bond.  This all takes time, so the defendant will remain in jail longer when a property bond is used rather than a cash bond.

Summary

Only time will tell us if the new rules have the desired effect of equalizing justice and decreasing the number of inmates sitting in jail, awaiting trial. Will we see more crimes committed by defendants who are released pending trial?  Will we see more defendants who fail to show up for court dates?  We will need to wait to see what the future holds.

Resources

www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/moneymatters.asp
www.azcourts.gov/rules/Recent-Amendments/Rules-of-Criminal-Procedure

Comments:

QUESTIONS

  • What is the efile code for trying to withdraw a bench warrant
  • I have a witness that has offered to testify at my criminal trial. I believe he will show up. Do I have to subpoena him to make sure the prosecutor doesn't try to disallow his testimony? Since I am representing myself, if I am required to subpoena him, do I request the subpoena through the court clerk in Gilbert?
  • Hi! I am one of the very lucky people to be granted a new trial. There was an error at trial and the judge ordered a new trial. My question is what happens at a retrial? Is it the same testimony from the first trial or can the victims change their story? For example, the victim admitted hitting me first during the first trial. Can he change that or does testimony have to be the same? I need to know this to help make a decision regarding accepting a plea offer. My attorney is unsure.
  • I have been convicted of a DUI, which occurred in 2010. This is my first DUI and I have never had problems with the law ever before, nor since. I have been given 180 days in jail, or go to class and pay fines of about $2500.00, and nine days in jail. I do not currently have a job, but will find work after the nine days in jail. I do not have any funds at this time. I suffer from panic attacks and I am a member of CODAC Behavioral Health. I want to attend classes and complete the program. How can I avoid the 180 days in jail, as I have no funds?
  • I now live out of state and I have a failure to comply warrent out for failure to pay my fines and my question is if I am outside of Mohave county and outside of the state can I be extradited for this misdemeanor warrant if I get my record run by the police out of state.
  • I was arrested and charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and disorderly conduct over a year ago. At the time I was threatened by the size of the male standing over and blocking me although he did not verbally say he was going to hurt me. I have a settlement conference soon and my lawyer has said that a plea will necessarily include at least a year of jail time and I would not get off for self-defense if this goes to trial since he did not verbally threaten me. I am pregnant and due to deliver before the settlement conference. Does this plea offer seem reasonable?
  • what are the laws for underage dui and causing a accident involving death and the laws of leaving scene of fatal dui accident
  • I recently got arrested for Domestic Violence as a misdemeanor. I have a clean record and never been arrested before. Also the victim isn't pressing charges and it was a misunderstanding. What will my sentence be if I'm going to be currently seeking counseling.
  • have a prior conviction for attempted 1st degree murder. did 13yrs and finished parole. got arrested during a search of my house, i was told i am a prohibited posspossessor and that the two folding pocket knives were ion violation. they were gerber knives . they are now going to use my prior feloney to enhance my sentance. is this legal, and can i have the pocket knives?
  • I would like to know what the statute of limitations is ,if there is one, regarding a warrant for possession of narcotic manufacturing equip that was issued on me feb 2008. Does that warrant expire since I had moved out of AZ seven months before it went tO court without my knowledge

STORIES

LegalLEARN

FIND LEGAL HELP

  • Please select your county of residence below.

    County:
     

OTHER LEGAL RESOURCES

  • State Bar of Arizona
    www.azbar.org
  • Maricopa County Bar
    www.maricopabar.org
    Referral number 602-257-4434
  • Pima County Bar
    www.pimacountybar.org
    Referral number 520-623-4625
  • National Domestic Violence Hotline
    800-799-7233
  • Bankruptcy Court Self Help Center
    866-553-0893
  • Certified Legal Document Preparer Program
    Link

ORGANIZATIONS