Discrimination on the Job Article
Historic Civil Rights Act offers new hope for fighting discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity
Historic Civil Rights Act offers new hope for fighting discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity
July 12 marks the 50th anniversary of the signing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, one of the most important moments for civil rights in the history of the United States. Also known as Title VII, the act prohibits discrimination against individuals on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin.
Are there civil rights protections for the LGBT community?
While Phoenix, Tempe and Tucson have passed protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, there is no Arizona or federal law providing such protection.
BUT
The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would amend Title VII to include protections against discrimination based upon sexual orientation and gender identity, was first introduced to protect "affectional or sexual preference" in 1975. ENDA passed in the current session of the U.S. Senate, but is mired in the partisan politics of the House.
AND
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and a U.S. District Court have breathed new life into a 25-year-old U.S. Supreme Court case, relying upon it for the principle that Title VII in its current form already protects individuals against discrimination based upon sexual orientation and gender identity.
The EEOC recently announced that Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity on the basis that such discrimination is rooted in the sex stereotyping prohibited by the Price Waterhouse decision. The EEOC Strategic Enforcement Plan for 2013-2016 lists "coverage of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals under Title VII" as one of its top six national enforcement priorities.
Are members of the LGBT community being discriminated against?
In a study by the Williams Institute, 68 percent of gay, lesbian and bisexual individuals reported having experienced employment discrimination. Transgender individuals experience unemployment at twice the rate of the general population, and 50 percent report having been harassed at work.
What case law outlines the EEOC’s position?
In the 1999 case Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, Ann Hopkins sued Price Waterhouse for discrimination based on sex, in violation of Title VII. Hopkins was a senior manager who was up for partner in the accounting firm. She was denied partnership on the basis that she was considered to be too "macho." The firm advised her that she could improve her chances for partnership if she were "to take a course at charm school, walk more femininely, talk more femininely, wear make-up, have her hair styled and wear jewelry."
The Supreme Court ruled that it did not "require expertise in psychology to know that, if an employee's flawed ‘interpersonal skills' can be corrected by a soft-hued suit or a new shade of lipstick, perhaps it is the employee's sex and not her interpersonal skills that has drawn the criticism."
The court continued that "we are beyond the day when an employer could evaluate employees by assuming or insisting that they matched the stereotype associated with their group, for ‘in forbidding employers to discriminate against individuals because of their sex,' Congress intended to strike at the entire spectrum of disparate treatment of men and women resulting from sex stereotypes."
A U.S. District Court recently agreed with this EEOC position in a case involving claims that a Library of Congress employee, Peter TerVeer, faced discrimination after his boss found out that he was gay. The Library of Congress filed a motion to dismiss TerVeer's claims, arguing that Title VII does not cover claims of discrimination based upon sexual orientation. The judge denied the motion, ruling that TerVeer stated a valid claim and if he could prove the facts alleged in his complaint, he could succeed in his lawsuit based on his Title VII claim. TerVeer's lawsuit claims that his boss created a "hostile environment in which he imposed his religion and sexual stereotypes" on TerVeer.
So what does this mean?
If you believe you are one of the 68 percent of gay, lesbian or bisexual Americans who have been discriminated against or harassed at work based upon your sexual orientation, or on the basis of your gender identity, you may have a claim under Title VII. Consult with a knowledgeable employment lawyer to see if you may have a claim, or visit the local office of the EEOC. If you own or operate a business, you should consult with your employment lawyer about updating policies and providing training to your management staff.
Contributing Attorney Writer: Jeff Brodin is the founder of Brodin HR Law.
Comments:
Comments:
QUESTIONS
-
I was charged with a crime in 2007 and the district attorney never decided to file charges in time but this charge is on my record is preventing me from job oppourtunities what can I do
-
Can an organazation prefer one religion over another and request that employees sign a "statment of faith"?
-
I work at an Insurance company, one of the account executive offended me and made me feel incompetent of my job just because Im an Asian. I feel that they are being prejudice. Is this ground for lawsuit of discrimination act?
-
MANY TIMES AT WORK EMPLOYEES HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT THEY CANNOT SPEAK IN THEIR PRIMARY LANGUAGE, MOSTLY ARE SPANISH SPEAKING PEOPLE, IS THERE A LAW THAT APPLIES TO THIS WHERE THE EMPLOYER CAN ORDER HIS EMPLOYEES NOT TO SPEAK IN SPANISH OR ANY OTHER LANGUAGE THAT THEY SPEAK??....
-
How old do you have to be to get a job
-
What is the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)?
-
I was working as a health care worker and a patient didn't trust me because i was a new employee. So he made a big deal of everything making the environment difficult. I dont know whati did but he complained. My boss could have switched us out but he sent me back. He then says he could fire me and get my license took. I later find out that I resigned. I was an on call employee and he just stopped calling me in. No write ups, nothing. So i get a letter in the mail saying I quit. Do i have a case?
-
I know blacklisting is illegal but is very difficult to prove unless there is a written paper trail. I believe in my case there is no paper trail it is all word of mouth. Is there anything I can do?
-
I was targeted by other staff who did not do their jobs according to policeys, I was responcible for menu/budget also medical appointments and to communicate care plans. other staff who did not want to follow Dr. driven diet plans or portion control complained I was bossie. Now my former employer is using these without merit complaints against me to block my eligibility for UC. Also the day of discharge i was in such shock that I signed the termination paper and it was not explained to me to also write in my side of said incident. Now that also is being used against me as evidence. any hope 4m
-
At my current job I began outside, when my asthma began effecting me we moved inside to another position in a building where it did not make my asthma any better. Finally they moved me to a position where my health wasnt compromised, a month ago they gave me the option to go back to the two previous position that effected my health when I explained that my health was in jeopardy they kept insisting the same two positions stating they needed people their. Can I file a lawsuit for them forcing me into a threatening position?
STORIES
LegalLEARN
-
Free & Reduced Fees Legal Aid Resources
Click Here to apply online, or call
866-637-5341.
FIND LEGAL HELP
- Please select your county of residence below.
OTHER LEGAL RESOURCES
-
State Bar of Arizona
www.azbar.org -
Maricopa County Bar
www.maricopabar.org
Referral number 602-257-4434 -
Pima County Bar
www.pimacountybar.org
Referral number 520-623-4625 -
National Domestic Violence Hotline
800-799-7233 -
Bankruptcy Court Self Help Center
866-553-0893 -
Certified Legal Document Preparer Program
Link
ORGANIZATIONS
- Arizona Fair Housing Center
View full description - Defenders of Children
View full description - DNA - People's Legal Services - Chinle
View full description - Arizona Senior Citizens Law Project
View full description - Maricopa County Regional Homeless Court
View full description